Transgender dating mtf amp ftm ver los incorregibles online dating
As such, I can’t endorse it – but it’s a cool way of looking at things and I hope someone tries something similar and does it right – which would probably involve starting with a prior that each general is average and treating each battle as a new piece of Bayesian evidence.We often hear that the amount parents talk to their baby is vital in explaining their development and life outcomes, so Scientific American profiles a South American tribe where parents practically never talk to their babies.H/T Buck, who writes that “if you think that repealing net neutrality is clearly bad, I’d love to bet you about it.
Legends of Chinese immigrants in California, unsourced, sometimes a bit implausible.Venus only has one earthquake every hundred million years or so, but it’s a doozy. Polk) The 100 most-discussed scientific papers of the year. Related, though you’ve probably seen it already: Deep Mind has made an AI that can learn to play at superhuman level in various games including chess, Japanese chess, and Go – after just a few hours of practice. For those of you who don’t know, they’re a research institute that looks into the possibility of future AI superintelligence and how to make it safe for humans.A combination of health-relevant, politics-relevant, clickbaity, and groundbreaking new science. The latest thing AI is outperforming humans at, this time very close to my heart: fantasy cartography. I can vouch for them as good people; see also Zvi Mowshowitz’s I Vouch For MIRI. less market freedom seems to be pretty big explanatory variable; being in Latin America doesn’t help.loss record, but doesn’t adjust for number of battles.So a general who fought 30 battles and won 50% would be “better” than a general who fought 10 battles and won 100%.